1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 87 Ohio
  5. 87 Ohio St.3d 371 (2000)
 

PEREZ v. FALLS FINANCIAL, INC.

No. 98-1775.

87 Ohio St.3d 371 (2000)

PEREZ, APPELLANT, v. FALLS FINANCIAL, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 5, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Norton; Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., and Patrick F. Roche, for appellant.

Milisor & Nobil Co., L.P.A., Sue Marie Douglas, Keith L. Pryatel and Stephen C. Sutton, for appellees.

PFEIFER, J.

We find that the facts of this case fail to reach the very high standard necessary to invoke the civil plain error doctrine set forth by this court in Goldfuss v. Davidson (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 116, 679 N.E.2d 1099, syllabus.

In Goldfuss, this court set forth the standard for the plain error doctrine as follows:

"In appeals of civil cases, the plain error doctrine is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases