The motion to restore was properly denied where disclosure was not complete when the action was stricken from the trial calender, no disclosure took place while the case was off the calendar, and defendants would be prejudiced by having to complete disclosure eleven years after the incident and eight years after the action was stricken (see, Rodriguez v Middle Atl. Auto Leasing,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FRANKOLA v. MAINCO COMPANY, INC.
277 A.D.2d 178 (2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 129
MARIA FRANKOLA, Appellant, v. MAINCO COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents. MAINCO COMPANY, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CAESAR PARK HOTEL AMERICA, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 30, 2000.
Decided November 30, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
