1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 11 P.3d
  5. 11 P.3d 441 (2000)
 

DUDDING v. NORTON FRICKEY & ASSOCIATES

No. 99SC403.

11 P.3d 441 (2000)

Richard DUDDING, Petitioner, v. NORTON FRICKEY & ASSOCIATES, a Delaware corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

October 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roberta Earley, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Attorney for Petitioner.

Norton Frickey & Associates, Robert B. Carey, Dawn R. Kubik, L. Dan Rector, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.

Justice KOURLIS delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This case concerns the interrelationship between a contingency fee agreement and an attorney's request for quantum meruit recovery. Richard Dudding (Dudding) hired Norton Frickey & Associates (Frickey) to litigate a wrongful termination of employment claim on his behalf. Dudding and Frickey entered into a contingency fee agreement setting out the conditions of payment for Frickey's services. Ultimately, Dudding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases