1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 106 F.Supp.2d
  5. 106 F.Supp.2d 345 (2000)
 

SCHMIDT v. DEVINO

No. 3:99 CV 555 JGM.

106 F.Supp.2d 345 (2000)

Donald SCHMIDT, et al. v. Kenneth DEVINO, et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 5, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Brennan, Brennan & Isaac, Waterbury, CT, for plaintiffs.

Frederick W. Krug, Matzkin, Krug & Danen, P.C., Waterbury, CT, for defendants.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

On March 25, 1999, Donald Schmidt ["Schmidt"] filed a four-count complaint against Kenneth Devino and Devino Fuels, Inc. ["defendants"] pursuant to the Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. for the alleged wiretapping of his workplace telephone. (Dkt. # 1 at ¶¶ 1, 6 & 8).1 Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases