Contrary to defendant's argument, the verdict convicting him of auto stripping was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The element of intent to destroy or deface a part of a vehicle was satisfied by ample evidence, including the extensive damage to the door lock on the complainant's car, which permitted the jury to infer that defendant intended the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.