Although offered the opportunity to demonstrate a meritorious defense to registration of the Canadian order of support, respondent failed to do so, despite the passage of two months. Moreover, his failure timely to appear in court on the scheduled day warranted denial of vacatur of his default (see, Matter of Heck v Heck,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF SOROKINA v. FERNANDEZ
278 A.D.2d 164 (2000)
719 N.Y.S.2d 8
In the Matter of ALISSA SOROKINA, Respondent, v. FRANCISCO FERNANDEZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 28, 2000.
Decided December 28, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.