1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 340 S.C.
  5. 340 S.C. 98 (2000)
 

INGRAM v. KASEY'S ASSOCIATES

No. 25116.

340 S.C. 98 (2000)

531 S.E.2d 287

Henry INGRAM, Respondent, v. KASEY'S ASSOCIATES, a South Carolina Limited Partnership and Roy Prescott d/b/a Remy's, Inc. and Remy's, Inc. Petitioners.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided May 1, 2000.

Rehearing Denied June 6, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Richardson Wieters, of G. Richardson Wieters, P.C., of Hilton Head, and Stephen A. Spitz, of Columbia, for petitioner Kasey's Associates.

H. Fred Kuhn, Jr., of Moss & Kuhn, of Beaufort, for petitioners Roy Prescott d/b/a Remy's, Inc. and Remy's, Inc.

Samuel S. Svalina, of Svalina Law Firm, and J. Brent Kiker, of Kiker & Douds, P.A., both of Beaufort, for respondent.

TOAL, Justice:

Kasey's Associates ("Kasey's") and Roy Prescott ("Prescott") appeal the Court of Appeals' decision that Henry Ingram's ("Ingram") written notice of intent to exercise his option was sufficient to fulfill the terms of the option contract. The decision of the Court of Appeals is REVERSED for four main reasons: (1) the Court of Appeals used no equity doctrines, even though Ingram sought an equitable remedy; (2) the Court of Appeals did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases