The motion court correctly held that the United States District Court order of June 10, 1998 collaterally estops plaintiff from asserting that the idea he claims that defendants misappropriated was novel, and precludes all of plaintiff's causes of action herein. The stipulated withdrawal of plaintiff's appeal to the Second Circuit left the District Court's order intact. There is no merit to plaintiff's argument that his attorney's alleged ineptitude deprived him of a full...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
