1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 10 P.3d
  5. 10 P.3d 428 (2000)
 

PIEPKORN v. ADAMS

No. 44894-3-I.

10 P.3d 428 (2000)

102 Wash.App. 673

Michael PIEPKORN and Shelley Desmond, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Daniel ADAMS and Mary Anne Adams, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered September 25, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marion Ellen Morgenstern, Christopher Ian Brain, Seattle, for Appellants.

Jeffrey T. Broihier, Broihier & Wotipka, Seattle, for Respondents.

KENNEDY, J.

Mary Anne and Daniel Adams (hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as Adams) live in a residential development that is subject to restrictive covenants. One covenant prohibits any structures from being erected, placed, or altered on any lot unless the development's Architectural Control Committee approves the structure's construction plans. And another covenant states that lot-line fences are permitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases