In this action for specific performance and damages for the alleged breach of a contract to purchase real property, the motion court properly found that the purported letter agreement was void pursuant to the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]) since it failed to state all the material terms of a complete agreement, "a material element of the contemplated bargain ha[ving] been left for further negotiations" (Generas v Hotel des Artistes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RAJ ACQUISITION CORP. v. ATAMANUK
272 A.D.2d 164 (2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 21
RAJ ACQUISITION CORP. et al., Appellants, v. JAMES ATAMANUK, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 16, 2000.
Decided May 16, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
