1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 99 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 333 (2000)
 

CITY OF EL MONTE v. COMMISSION

No. C025631.

99 Cal.Rptr.2d 333 (2000)

83 Cal.App.4th 266

CITY OF EL MONTE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, Defendant and Respondent; Department of Finance, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Rehearing Denied August 23, 2000.

Review Denied November 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of William D. Ross, William D. Ross, Carol B. Sherman and J. Robert Flandrick, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Gary D. Hori, Legal Counsel, Camille Shelton, Staff Counsel, Commission on State Mandates for Defendant and Respondent.

Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, Linda A. Cabatic and Pete Southworth, Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

SCOTLAND, P.J.

In this appeal from the trial court's denial of a petition for writ of administrative mandate, we are called upon to determine whether legislation requiring local redevelopment agencies to contribute to a local Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) constituted a reimbursable state mandate under article XIII B, section 6 of California's Constitution.

As we shall explain, we agree with the trial court that the legislation did not constitute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases