The parol evidence rule precludes defendant from relying on extrinsic evidence to establish that the subject swap contract was one of two interdependent components of a single contract, the other being a contract for the physical sale of the same amount of the same commodity by defendant's affiliate to plaintiff to which no reference is made in the fully integrated swap contract documents (see, Schonfeld v Thompson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
TRANSAMMONIA, INC. v. ENRON CAPITAL & TRADE RESOURCES CORP.
278 A.D.2d 152 (2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 62
TRANSAMMONIA, INC., Respondent, v. ENRON CAPITAL & TRADE RESOURCES CORP., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 21, 2000.
Decided December 21, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
