PEOPLE v. IRRIZARRY


277 A.D.2d 153 (2000)

716 N.Y.S.2d 303

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM IRRIZARRY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 28, 2000.


Evidence concerning an uncharged contemporaneous sale was properly admitted since it completed the narrative of events, was relevant to the contested issue of identity, and was not unduly prejudicial (People v Pressley, 216 A.D.2d 202, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 800). However, we find the sentence imposed excessive to the extent indicated.

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases