1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 340 S.C.
  5. 340 S.C. 87 (2000)
 

BUGSY'S, INC. v. CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH

No. 25111.

340 S.C. 87 (2000)

530 S.E.2d 890

BUGSY'S, INC., Highway Coffee, Inc., Pool Services Unlimited of MB, Inc., 6401 Convenience, Inc., and Candy Treats, Inc., Appellants, v. The CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided April 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howell V. Bellamy, Jr., and Douglas M. Zayicek, of Bellamy, Rutenberg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely & Bowers, P.A., of Myrtle Beach, for appellants.

James B. Van Osdell and Cynthia Graham Howe of Van Osdell, Lester, Howe & Jordan, P.A., of Myrtle Beach, for respondent.

BURNETT, Justice:

This action challenges the validity of Respondent the City of Myrtle Beach's (the City's) Zoning Ordinance 96-56 which, in part, affects some businesses which operate video poker machines. The master-in-equity determined Ordinance 96-56 was valid. Alternatively, the master-in-equity held appellants were operating in violation of the prior zoning ordinance. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases