The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence warranted a reasonable inference that the unapprehended participant in the crime had taken his knife halfway out of his pocket as a means of displaying it for the purpose of intimidating the victims. Therefore, the evidence established the element of threatened use...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.