IN RE WIMMERSHOFF

No. 99SA27.

3 P.3d 417 (2000)

In the Matter of Nicholas A. WIMMERSHOFF Attorney-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

As Modified June 12, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Gleason, Attorney Regulation Counsel, James C. Coyle, Assistant Regulation Counsel, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Complainant.

Nicholas A. Wimmershoff, Pro Se, Longmont, Colorado.


PER CURIAM.

This is an attorney regulation case. A hearing board found that the attorney-respondent, Nicholas A. Wimmershoff, charged his client an unreasonable fee, deposited part of this unreasonable fee into his operating account (although it had not been fully earned), failed to adequately explain the basis of his fee to the client, and violated the rules governing contingent fee agreements. A hearing panel of our former grievance committee1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases