OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOAGUE

No. 99-1498.

88 Ohio St.3d 321 (2000)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOAGUE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 29, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Kenneth R. Donchatz, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Geoffrey Stern, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board. Respondent misused the authority of his judicial office in an attempt to achieve his personal goal of reprimanding persons he believed were guilty of reckless driving.

A judge who observes a crime outside the courtroom has only the power of an ordinary citizen. Respondent's proper course would have been to file charges against Panescu and Brown. Instead, respondent used the power of his office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases