IN RE GEEDING

No. 84,993.

270 Kan. 139 (2000)

12 P.3d 396

In the Matter of MARTIN D. GEEDING, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed October 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank D. Diehl, deputy disciplinary administrator, argued the cause and was on the formal complaint for petitioner.

D. Lee McMaster, of Wichita, argued the cause for respondent, and Martin D. Geeding, respondent, argued the cause pro se.


Per Curiam:

This is an original uncontested proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against the respondent, Martin D. Geeding, alleging violations of Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC) 1.7 (representing a client when the representation would be in conflict with another client) (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 321), and 1.8 (conflict of interest involving compensation from one other than the client) (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases