Defendant's challenges to the prosecutor's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged portions of the summation were fair comment on the evidence made in response to credibility issues raised by defendant and that the prosecutor did not express a personal opinion on the credibility of witnesses (see, People v Overlee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. JONES
278 A.D.2d 130 (2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 540
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD JONES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 19, 2000.
Decided December 19, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.