Defendant's motion to suppress identification evidence was properly denied. The identification made by the complainant during the canvass of the area was spontaneous and was not the product of police suggestiveness (see, People v Spruill,
Defendant's sufficiency argument as to the physical injury element of robbery in the second degree is not preserved for appellate review...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.