O'ROURKE v. CHELSEA PIERS MANAGEMENT


272 A.D.2d 135 (2000)

708 N.Y.S.2d 607

JOHN F. O'ROURKE, Plaintiff, v. CHELSEA PIERS MANAGEMENT et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 9, 2000.


Defendants, in support of their cross motion for summary judgment, presented documentary evidence demonstrating a prima facie entitlement to judgment in their favor, declaring that, pursuant to the subject policy issued by third-party defendant IINA, they were covered for the claim made by plaintiff in the main action and, accordingly, were entitled to be defended and indemnified against liability for that claim by IINA. In opposition to the motion, IINA merely submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases