ROSE v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B134032.

92 Cal.Rptr.2d 313 (2000)

77 Cal.App.4th 1185

Clarence Lasalle ROSE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent. The People, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

Rehearing Granted February 24, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Gold, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, San Francisco, for Petitioner.

County of Los Angeles Office of the County Counsel, Lloyd W. Pellman, County Counsel, and Frederick R. Bennett, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondent.

No appearance by Real Party in Interest.


OPINION AND ORDER

GILBERT, P.J.

This is a case in which this court should not have to grant a writ of mandate. We must do so nonetheless because the superior court did not comply with our order that it conduct a hearing on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court's failure to follow our explicit order sets a poor example for litigants, lawyers, and the public. It undermines the administration of justice and fosters disrespect for the law.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases