The application was properly denied with leave to renew after appellant was psychiatrically evaluated, in view of the ample evidence adduced by the court evaluator that appellant is not presently able to manage her property, the conflict in the opinions of the reporting psychiatrists as to whether appellant is presently able to manage her property, and the recommendation of the court evaluator for a further psychiatric evaluation by an independent psychiatrist (Mental Hygiene...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
