1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 33 S.W.3d
  5. 33 S.W.3d 369 (2000)
 

CARTER v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 2-00-100-CV.

33 S.W.3d 369 (2000)

Thomas CARTER, Mary Carter, and Ed Carter, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Rehearing Overruled December 14, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paxton, Beal, L.L.P., Eric D. Beal, Arlington, for Appellant.

Colaneri, Massad & Reilly, P.C., Bobbi Reilly and Janet K. Colaneri, Arlington, for Appellee.

Panel A: CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and HOLMAN, JJ.

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellants Thomas Carter, Mary Carter, and Ed Carter appeal from a take nothing summary judgment. In five points, the Carters argue that the trial court erred in granting State Farm's summary judgment motion because (1) it lacked specificity; (2) it was based upon an incorrect legal premise; (3) State Farm did not conclusively establish the necessary factual predicate; (4) State Farm mischaracterized the Carters' insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases