The court properly declined to charge the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance. The evidence, even when viewed in a light most favorable to defendant, establishes that while defendant acted out of anger, the circumstances did not rise to a level at which the elements of the extreme emotional disturbance defense were satisfied (see, People v White,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BINKLEY
278 A.D.2d 124 (2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 172
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID BINKLEY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 19, 2000.
Decided December 19, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.