1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 17 S.W.3d
  5. 17 S.W.3d 385 (2000)
 

LEAL v. CITY OF ROSENBERG

No. 07-00-0140-CV.

17 S.W.3d 385 (2000)

Mary L. LEAL, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF ROSENBERG, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

April 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frode Willumsen, Willumsen Law Firm, P.C., Houston, for appellant.

William S. Helfand, Magenheim Bateman & Helfand, P.L.L.C., Houston, for appellee.

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ.

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Pending before the Court is the motion of the City of Rosenberg (City) to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is allegedly non-existent because the motion for new trial filed by appellant Mary L. Leal (Leal) purportedly failed to extend the period within which to perfect her appeal. Furthermore, the motion for new trial allegedly failed to extend the period because it was filed in the wrong

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases