PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. STONEHAM

No. C-990859.

140 Ohio App.3d 260 (2000)

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. STONEHAM, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County.

Decided September 29, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dinsmore & Shohl, Nancy A. Lawson, Mark A. Vander Loan and Lawrence R. Elleman; Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White, Mark D. Wegener, Kenneth W. Brothers and Gary Thompson, for appellant.

Lindhorst & Dreidane, Leo J. Breslin and James C. Frooman; Kirkland & Ellis, Brian D. Sieve and Anne J. McClain, for appellee.


HILDEBRANDT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, the Procter & Gamble Company ("P&G"), appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its claims against defendant-appellee, Paul Stoneham, for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. P&G sought damages and injunctive relief against Stoneham, claiming that he had violated a non-compete agreement that he had signed while employed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases