1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 27 S.W.3d
  5. 27 S.W.3d 371 (2000)
 

IN RE ARK. CODE OF JUD. CONDUCT, CANON 4(H)

27 S.W.3d 371 (2000)

In re ARKANSAS CODE of JUDICIAL CONDUCT, CANON 4(h).

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

September 21, 2000.

PER CURIAM.

By formal action at its annual meeting, the Arkansas Judicial Council brought to the Court's attention that there is presently confusion among the judges of the state as to the meaning of the term "compensation" for reporting under Canon 4(H)(2) of the Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct and requested clarification of the term. We have reviewed the provision and the information furnished by the Arkansas Judicial Council and agree that clarification is needed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases