CLARK v. WITCO CORP.

No. CIV. A. 98-300 ERIE.

102 F.Supp.2d 292 (2000)

Carl CLARK, David Barger and Edward Schwab, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WITCO CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

January 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Paul Garhart, Arthur D. Martinucci, Quinn, Buseck, Leemhuis, Toohey & Kroto, Inc., Erie, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Thomas A. Donovan, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Pittsburgh, PA, Kenneth A. Margolis, Laura Sack, Kauff, McClain & McGuire, New York City, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This civil action arises out of the sale of a refinery and blending and packaging plant in Bradford, Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs claim they are entitled to severance benefits because the sale effectively ended their employment relationship with the Defendant. Presently pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. For all of the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases