1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 214 F.3d
  5. 214 F.3d 175 (2000)
 

U.S. v. HALL

No. 99-3141.

214 F.3d 175 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Dennis HALL, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 2, 2000.

As Amended August 7, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Tourish, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Wilma A. Lewis, U.S. Attorney, and John R. Fisher and Anne Pings, Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

Sara E. Kopecki argued the cause and filed the brief for appellee.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

Appellant, the United States, raises only one question on this appeal: Did the District Court have jurisdiction to grant a motion for a new trial nunc pro tunc (which literally means "now for then") in order to circumvent the time limitations of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33? Rule 33 provides that a motion for a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases