FREED v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION

No. 99-3191.

201 F.3d 188 (2000)

Janice FREED, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed January 10, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Wade, Peirce, Raimond, Osterhout, Wade, Carlson & Coulter, Pittsburgh, PA, Joseph M. Sellers (Argued), Suzette M. Malveaux, Deborah J. Vagins, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Thomas H. May (Argued), Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellee.

Corbett Anderson, McGuiness, Norris & Williams, Washington, DC, for Amicus-Appellee Equal Employment Advisory Council.

Before: SLOVITER, MANSMANN, and ROTH, Circuit Judges,


OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Janice Freed appeals from the order dismissing her claim against the Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") under the Rehabilitation Act for failure to exhaust her administrative remedies. Her appeal requires that we decide whether a plaintiff must exhaust administrative remedies prior to bringing suit under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act against a private recipient of federal funds.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases