Defendant-appellant pediatric cardiologist's motion for summary judgment was properly denied since a material issue of fact exists as to whether defendant-appellant's alleged statement, that he did not believe the infant plaintiff was in congestive heart failure and that his examination of the child could wait until the following day, constituted incorrect affirmative advice (see, Miller v Sullivan,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
