Defendant's motion was properly denied since there was competent objective medical evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered significant or permanent injury to her lumbosacral spine and whether she was unable to perform substantially all of her daily activities for at least 90 out of the 180 days following the accident (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Adetunji v U-Haul Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SHULMAN v. PAPELL
273 A.D.2d 111 (2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 527
MILDRED SHULMAN, Respondent, v. BEVERLY PAPELL, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 15, 2000.
Decided June 15, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.