1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 268 A.D.2d
  5. 268 A.D.2d 115 (2000)
 

CHASE RESEARCH v. NIA GROUP

268 A.D.2d 115 (2000)

708 N.Y.S.2d 128

CHASE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, INC., Appellant, v. NIA GROUP, INC., Also Known as NIA-KLT, et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barton & Zasky, New York City (Roger E. Barton and Hillary H. Hughes of counsel), for appellant.

Lustig & Brown, New York City (Gil A. Isidro of counsel), for respondents.

BRACKEN, J. P., SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FRIEDMANN, J.

On the instant appeal, we must determine whether the three-year Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 214 (6), as amended in 1996 (L 1996, ch 623, § 1), which governs certain malpractice actions, applies to bar the instant action against insurance brokers to recover damages arising out of their alleged failure to procure appropriate insurance for their client, or whether the action is governed by the six-year Statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases