The court properly exercised its discretion in ordering restrictive placement based upon its determination that the needs and best interests of appellant and the safety of the community mandated placement given the seriousness of the crime as well as appellant's predatory tendencies (see, Family Ct Act § 353.5 [1], [2]; Matter of Manuel R.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.