The jury's verdict rejecting defendant's agency defense was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established that defendant acted primarily for his own benefit in promoting the sale, and that the benefit he received cannot be described as incidental (see, People v Lam Lek Chong,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DAVIS
273 A.D.2d 104 (2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 81
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WARREN DAVIS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 15, 2000.
Decided June 15, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.