ROSARIO v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY


272 A.D.2d 105 (2000)

707 N.Y.S.2d 421

SERAFINA ROSARIO, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 9, 2000.


While it is true that the imposition of sanctions for discovery misfeasance is a matter within the motion court's discretion (Palmenta v Columbia Univ., 266 A.D.2d 90; Gomez v New York City Hous. Auth., 217 A.D.2d 110, 114), the extreme sanction of dismissal is warranted only where a clear showing has been made that non-compliance with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases