The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court's determinations concerning credibility. The sexual gratification element (Penal Law § 130.00 [3]) could be readily inferred from appellant's conduct itself, for which he provided no credible explanation (see, Matter of James OO.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.