1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 277 A.D.2d
  5. 277 A.D.2d 93 (2000)
 

ESCOBAR v. GONZALEZ

277 A.D.2d 93 (2000)

717 N.Y.S.2d 27

MADELINE ESCOBAR, Respondent, v. EDWIN GONZALEZ, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 16, 2000.

The question whether a contract provision is ambiguous is one of law to be resolved by the court (see, Van Wagner Adv. Corp. v S & M Enters., 67 N.Y.2d 186, 191). In the instant action, the court erred in concluding that the terms of the parties' agreement were not ambiguous, since the provisions did not clearly set forth the time limitations for the transfer of the shares of stock. The evidence does not support the contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases