1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 235 Wis.2d
  5. 235 Wis.2d 132 (2000)
 

ZIMBRICK v. LIRC

No. 99-1894.

235 Wis.2d 132 (2000)

2000 WI App 106

613 N.W.2d 198

Gail ZIMBRICK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION, Defendant-Co-Appellant, DE PERE FOUNDRY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 18, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of R. George Burnett of Liebmann, Conway, Olejniczak & Jerry, S.C., Green Bay.

On behalf of the defendant-co-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Jerome S. Schmidt, assistant attorney general.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Gary R. Weidner of Hanaway, Weidner, Bachhuber, Woodward & Maloney, S.C., Green Bay.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.

¶ 1. PETERSON, J.

De Pere Foundry, Inc., and the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC or the commission) appeal a circuit court order holding that Gail Zimbrick did not receive adequate notice of a worker's compensation hearing. The court accepted Zimbrick's argument that the notice failed to explain her legal role at that hearing. We reverse the circuit court's order because Zimbrick failed to indicate how she...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases