Defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the element of use of a dangerous instrument under his attempted assault conviction, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence supports the inference of defendant's awareness of the danger posed by the electrified third rail of the subway, regardless of its particular location in relation to the platform, as well...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.