PACE v. PARIS MAINTENANCE CO.

No. 98 Civ. 1470 RWS.

107 F.Supp.2d 251 (2000)

Emilio PACE, Plaintiff, v. PARIS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, Pembrook Management Company, Corporate Property Investors, and Joseph Galea, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 12, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Rosenthal, New York City, for plaintiff.

Milman & Heidecker, Lake Success, NY, for defendant Paris Maintenance Co., by Perry S. Heidecker, of counsel.

Kelley Drye & Warren, New York City, for defendants Pembrook Management Company, Corporate Property Investors and Joseph Galea, by Kenneth Kirschner, Stephen P. Goulet, of counsel.


OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Corporate Property Investors ("CPI"), Pembrook Management Company ("Pembrook"), Joseph Galea ("Galea"), and Paris Maintenance Company ("Paris") (collectively, "Defendants") have moved, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of Emilio Pace ("Pace"). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted.

The Parties

Pace is a former employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases