1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 343 S.C.
  5. 343 S.C. 14 (2000)
 

WARD v. STATE

No. 25209.

343 S.C. 14 (2000)

538 S.E.2d 245

Doris Stieglitz WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. The STATE of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided November 6, 2000.

Rehearing Denied December 7, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M.S. Hoefer, B. Craig Collins, and Paige Jones Gossett, of Willoughby & Hoefer, P.A.; and A. Camden Lewis, of Lewis, Babcock & Hawkins, L.L.P., all of Columbia, for appellants.

Vance J. Bettis, of Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, L.L.P., of Columbia, for respondent.

MOORE, Acting Chief Justice:

The circuit court granted the State's motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

This case was filed as a class action suit arising from State action taken as result of the Davis v. Michigan Dep't of Treasury1 and Bass2 cases. Following Davis, the General Assembly passed Act No. 189 of 1989...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases