1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 273 A.D.2d
  5. 273 A.D.2d 84 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. CINTRON

273 A.D.2d 84 (2000)

709 N.Y.S.2d 67

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDGARDO CINTRON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 13, 2000.

Defendant's claim that the court failed to follow the procedures set forth in People v O'Rama (78 N.Y.2d 270, 277-278) in responding to the jury's request to visit the crime scene is unpreserved for appellate review. The court apprised defense counsel of the contents of the note prior to responding. Defense counsel did not request to inspect the note. When given the opportunity to meaningfully participate immediately following the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases