1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 88 Ohio
  5. 88 Ohio St.3d 268 (2000)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MEENEN

No. 99-1399.

88 Ohio St.3d 268 (2000)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MEENEN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 22, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Kevin L. Williams, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Per Curiam.

When an attorney has been disciplined in another state, Gov. Bar R. V(11)(F)(4)(a)(ii) requires us to impose an identical or comparable discipline unless the disciplined attorney shows by clear and convincing evidence that "the misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline in Ohio." Disciplinary Counsel v. Hine (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 448, 449, 687 N.E.2d 420, 421...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases