LAU v. MEDDAUGH

No. 99-9363.

229 F.3d 121 (2000)

Gilbert LAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark M. MEDDAUGH, et. al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, August Term, 2000.

Decided: October 5, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert Lau, pro se, New York, NY, for plaintiff-appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany, NY (Charles F. Sanders, Assistant Attorney General), for defendant-appellee Meddaugh.

Michael Frey, Esq., Liberty, NY, for defendants-appellees Cohen and Katz.

Before: JACOBS, STRAUB, and SACK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Gilbert Lau, pro se, appeals from a sua sponte oral order entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McMahon, J.), enjoining him from filing in that district any action on the same underlying facts unless he first submits the complaint to a United States Magistrate Judge for vetting. Lau raised three other issues on appeal which we reject in an unpublished summary order also filed today. See Lau...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases