1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 270 A.D.2d
  5. 270 A.D.2d 73 (2000)
 

GUILLOT v. AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED

270 A.D.2d 73 (2000)

704 N.Y.S.2d 245

FAIZATH GUILLOT, Appellant-Respondent, v. AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED, Also Known as ANZ INVESTMENT BANK, et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 9, 2000.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to hold respondents in contempt of court since it was not established with reasonable certainty that the subject income execution order was disobeyed or that respondents aided and abetted petitioner's husband in evading the court's support order (see, Matter of McCormick v Axelrod, 59 N.Y.2d 574, 583; cf., Corpuel v Galasso,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases