1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 270 A.D.2d
  5. 270 A.D.2d 69 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. GALLOZA

270 A.D.2d 69 (2000)

705 N.Y.S.2d 35

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIS GALLOZA, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARFIELD EWAN, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. QUARO MARTINEZ, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JESUS PEREZ, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 9, 2000.

By failing to object to the court's conduct as a whole or seek any remedy, defendants' contention that the trial court was biased and excessively interfered in the proceedings is not preserved (People v Charleston, 56 N.Y.2d 886), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find from our review of the entire record, that the court's interjections did not usurp the role of the attorneys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases