The sublease, which permitted "commercial use with ancillary living only" and contained no express representation as to the certificate of occupancy, was not automatically voided by the circumstance that plaintiff's contemplated use of the premises as a combination residence and video editing shop did not conform with the existing certificate of occupancy. The mere failure of a landlord to obtain a certificate of occupancy before a commercial tenant's date of occupancy does...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
