1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 273 A.D.2d
  5. 273 A.D.2d 63 (2000)
 

PINTO v. LITTLE FISH CORP.

273 A.D.2d 63 (2000)

709 N.Y.S.2d 61

KATHY L. PINTO et al., Appellants, v. LITTLE FISH CORP., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 8, 2000.

Giving plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference, it can only be said that a spill caused her to fall. There being no evidence of how long the spill had been on the floor, plaintiff's assertion that defendant's employees had constructive notice thereof is pure speculation based on nothing more than that the premises are a restaurant where water and beverages are served (see, Morales v Foodways, Inc., 186 A.D.2d 407; see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases